Insights From EnTech

Low volume injection molding fills the critical gap between prototyping and mass production, providing engineers with a versatile manufacturing solution for production runs typically ranging from 100 to 10,000 parts. This guide explores the essential aspects of this process, helping engineers make informed decisions when specifying and designing for low volume injection molding. As manufacturing demands continue to evolve toward more agile and responsive production methods, understanding the capabilities and limitations of low volume injection molding becomes increasingly valuable for today's engineering professionals. Understanding Low Volume Injection Molding Definition and Scope Low volume injection molding typically refers to production runs of smaller quantities than traditional mass production. These can range from approximately 100-1,000 parts for prototyping and early-stage testing, 1,000-5,000 parts for pilot production or niche markets, and up to 10,000 parts for short production runs. The exact definition of "low volume" varies by industry and application, but generally refers to quantities that don't justify the high investment of hardened steel tooling used in mass production. When to Choose Low Volume Injection Molding Low volume injection molding serves multiple purposes across the product development lifecycle. It excels in functional prototyping scenarios where engineers need multiple identical prototypes for testing and validation using actual production-grade materials. This provides more accurate test results than other prototyping methods that might use different materials or manufacturing processes. It also serves as an effective bridge production solution, filling the gap between initial prototyping and full-scale manufacturing. This approach allows companies to enter the market while traditional high-volume tooling is being developed, potentially generating revenue earlier in the product lifecycle. Market testing represents another valuable application, where companies can produce limited quantities to gauge market response before committing significant resources to mass production infrastructure. For specialized components with limited market demand, low volume injection molding often provides the only economically viable manufacturing path. Many manufacturers also leverage this approach for supply chain optimization, producing parts on-demand to reduce inventory costs and effectively manage demand volatility. This just-in-time manufacturing approach can significantly reduce warehousing costs and obsolescence risks. Tooling Options for Low Volume Production Aluminum Molds Aluminum molds represent the most common tooling solution for low volume injection molding due to their excellent balance of cost, speed, and performance. Compared to traditional steel molds used in high-volume production, aluminum tooling offers 40-60% lower costs and significantly faster lead times, typically 2-4 weeks versus the 4-8 weeks required for steel tooling. The superior thermal conductivity of aluminum—conducting heat approximately five times faster than steel—results in shorter cycle times during production. This thermal efficiency allows for quicker cooling of molded parts, reducing overall production time and increasing throughput. Additionally, aluminum's softer nature makes it easier to machine, further reducing tooling costs and lead time. While not as durable as steel, aluminum molds provide sufficient durability for low to medium production volumes, typically handling between 10,000 and 100,000 shots depending on the material being molded and the complexity of the part geometry. This makes them an ideal choice for most low-volume applications where tooling cost and lead time are critical factors. 3D Printed Molds For very small production runs or rapid prototyping needs, 3D printed molds offer an innovative and increasingly viable solution. These molds can be produced at significantly lower costs, often between $100-$500 for simple geometries, and with extremely fast turnaround times measured in days rather than weeks. This approach enables engineers to quickly iterate on designs without the financial burden of traditional tooling. 3D printed molds are most effective for producing limited quantities, typically between 50-200 parts, depending on the material being molded and the complexity of the part. They work particularly well for proof-of-concept models and initial market samples where dimensional precision is less critical than speed to market. However, these molds do come with significant limitations that engineers must consider. Their limited durability restricts them to lower shot counts, they're generally restricted to simpler geometries and less demanding materials, and they provide lower dimensional accuracy compared to metal molds. Temperature and pressure limitations also constrain the range of materials that can be effectively molded with 3D printed tooling. Soft Tooling Soft tooling using materials like silicone or urethane provides another option for short production runs. These molds can be produced at lower costs than aluminum tooling and with quick turnaround times, making them suitable for projects with extremely tight timelines or budget constraints. These tools perform best with parts featuring relatively simple geometries and work well for prototyping and very short production runs, typically under 500 shots. The flexible nature of these materials can sometimes allow for parts with features that might be challenging with rigid tooling, such as limited undercuts. Engineers should be aware that soft tooling comes with significant limitations, including restricted material compatibility, less precise tolerances, and a substantially shorter lifespan compared to metal tooling. These factors make soft tooling most appropriate for early development phases rather than ongoing production. DME MUD Inserts Some manufacturers use MUD (Master Unit Die) inserts for lower volume tooling as a cost-effective alternative to full custom molds. This universal mount system uses less steel and fewer off-the-shelf components to build the mold, resulting in significant savings on tooling costs. MUD inserts offer faster changeovers for multiple parts, making them particularly suitable for part families or products with multiple variants. The ability to reuse the base while changing only the inserts provides both economic and time advantages for appropriate applications.  This approach works best for smaller parts that fit within the standardized frame sizes of the MUD system. While not suitable for all applications, MUD inserts represent a valuable intermediate option between fully custom tooling and more temporary solutions like 3D printed molds. Material Selection Many thermoplastics used in high-volume injection molding are also well-suited for low-volume applications, offering engineers a broad range of options to meet specific project needs. However, successful material selection in low-volume production requires a strategic balance of several interrelated factors. The process should begin with functional requirements—ensuring that the material’s mechanical, thermal, electrical, and chemical properties align with the application. Cost is equally important, not just in terms of raw material price, but also processing conditions and cycle times, which can offset lower per-pound costs. Tooling compatibility is another key factor, especially when using aluminum molds common in low-volume runs. Abrasive materials, such as those with glass fiber reinforcement, can significantly reduce tool life and impact cost-effectiveness. Engineers should also account for post-processing needs like painting, texturing, or assembly. Selecting materials that meet aesthetic and performance standards straight out of the mold can streamline production and reduce lead times. Finally, environmental exposure—such as temperature extremes, chemicals, UV radiation, and moisture—must be considered to ensure long-term material performance. Choosing a material with the right resistance profile is critical to product durability and reliability. Design Considerations Wall Thickness - Maintaining a uniform wall thickness is essential to prevent molding defects like warping, sink marks, and internal stresses caused by uneven cooling. In low-volume production, where tooling revisions can be costly, getting wall thickness right the first time is especially important. Part Finish - Specifying the correct surface finish is key to balancing cost and performance. Highly polished finishes significantly raise tooling expenses due to the labor-intensive polishing process. For non-visible components, an as-machined finish is a cost-effective option. For moderate cosmetic needs, bead-blast texture provides a cleaner look without the high cost of polishing. Gate Location and Design - Gate placement directly affects how molten plastic flows through the mold, influencing both the quality and appearance of the part. Proper gate location ensures uniform filling and reduces the risk of weld lines or voids. Since gates leave marks, they should be positioned in low-visibility areas or where post-processing can easily remove marks or blemishes. Parting Lines - Parting lines—where mold halves meet—leave visible seams on finished parts and must be planned carefully. Avoid placing parting lines on functional or highly visible surfaces, such as sealing areas or product front faces. Instead, these lines should align with natural edges or surface transitions to minimize their appearance. Leveraging Low Volume Injection Molding Low volume injection molding offers engineers a versatile and cost-effective solution for producing high-quality plastic parts in quantities that bridge the gap between prototyping and mass production. By understanding the unique considerations, tooling options, and design principles outlined in this guide, engineers can successfully leverage this manufacturing method to accelerate product development, optimize costs, and bring innovative products to market more efficiently. EnTech Plastics specializes in low volume injection molding solutions tailored to your specific engineering challenges. Contact EnTech Plastics today to discuss your next engineering project and discover how our low volume injection molding capabilities can help you bring innovative products to market faster and more efficiently.

Designing a product that is both innovative and manufacturable is a delicate balancing act, especially in the realm of injection molding. The process of injecting plastic into molds to create intricate and functional parts is highly efficient, but its success relies heavily on thoughtful initial design. In this blog, we explore the principles of Design for Manufacturability (DFM) as they apply to injection molding; highlighting key considerations, strategies, and best practices for creating designs that are not only functional but also optimized for efficient and cost-effective production. The Importance of Design for Manufacturability Design for Manufacturability (DFM) is a holistic approach to product design that aims to streamline the manufacturing process, reduce production costs, improve product quality, and minimize time-to-market. In injection molding, DFM is particularly crucial because it directly impacts the ease and cost of producing parts. When implemented effectively, DFM practices ensure that the final design minimizes material waste by optimizing part geometry and reducing unnecessary features. This approach enhances moldability, creating designs that are easier to mold and reducing the risk of defects throughout the production process. A well-designed part can be manufactured quickly, leading to faster production cycles and shorter lead times, while simultaneously reducing the likelihood of producing defective parts. This saves valuable time and resources that would otherwise be spent on rework or scrap. Additionally, efficient designs require less complex molds and tooling, leading to significant cost savings in tooling setup. Key Principles of DFM in Injection Molding Simplicity is Key In injection molding, complexity often translates to higher costs and increased risk of defects. Simplifying part geometry whenever possible creates a more reliable manufacturing process. Complex designs typically require more elaborate tooling and increase the likelihood of production issues. Similarly, minimizing undercuts and sharp corners simplifies ejection and demolding processes, resulting in smoother production runs and higher-quality parts. Draft Angles and Wall Thickness Incorporating draft angles—slight tapers on vertical walls—makes it significantly easier to eject parts from molds and prevents surface defects that can occur during removal. Equally important is maintaining uniform wall thickness throughout the part. Uneven thickness can lead to warping, sink marks, and other quality issues as the material cools unevenly. Gas Assist injection molding , however, allows designers to strategically "break the rules" of uniform wall thickness. This innovative process injects nitrogen gas into thicker sections of the part, creating hollow channels that eliminate sink marks and warping while maintaining structural integrity. As demonstrated in EnTech's case study , this technique enables the creation of complex geometries with varying wall thicknesses that would be impossible with conventional molding methods. The result is enhanced design freedom, reduced material usage, faster cycle times, and the ability to produce parts with premium surface finishes even in traditionally challenging thick-walled sections. Structural Integrity Through Smart Design Rather than thickening walls to increase strength–which can lead to material waste and molding issues–adding strategic ribs provides structural support while optimizing material usage. For features that require fasteners or attachments, properly designed bosses ensure secure connections without compromising the overall strength of the part. Gates, Runners, and Flow Dynamics The placement of gates—entry points for molten plastic—significantly affects material flow and final part quality. Positioning gates in non-visible areas minimizes aesthetic issues while ensuring proper distribution of material. Complementing gate placement, well-designed runners efficiently distribute material throughout the mold, reducing cycle times and ensuring even filling. Technical Considerations for Optimal Results Planning for ejector pins requires careful consideration of their placement to avoid interference with part functionality or aesthetics. Strategically positioned ejector pins help ensure clean part removal without damage. Additionally, adequate venting prevents trapped air or gas, reducing the risk of surface defects like burn marks or incomplete filling. Material Selection and Performance Requirements Choosing materials with suitable properties impacts every aspect of the injection molding process. The selected material must balance moldability, strength, and cost while meeting application-specific requirements. Considerations such as stiffness, chemical resistance, and color requirements all influence the final performance of the part. Precision in Tolerances and Assembly Defining tolerances carefully is essential—they should be both achievable in the manufacturing process and necessary for the function of the part. Overly tight tolerances increase costs without adding value, while insufficient precision can compromise functionality. When designing parts that will be assembled with others, ensure they fit together properly by accounting for material shrinkage and potential variability in the molding process. Integration and Assembly Efficiency Modern injection molding techniques like overmolding and insert molding can reduce assembly steps and improve product functionality by integrating multiple components. Additionally, designing parts with ease of assembly in mind ensures that connectors, fasteners, and alignment features contribute to efficient manufacturing and assembly processes rather than complicating them. From Concept to Creation: The DFM Advantage Design for Manufacturability is far more than a technical consideration—it's a fundamental approach in injection molding that drives efficiency, reduces costs, and ensures the successful production of high-quality plastic parts. By embracing principles such as simplicity, appropriate draft angles, uniform wall thickness, and thoughtful gate placement, designers and engineers can optimize their designs for ease of molding and consistent quality. At EnTech Plastics, we specialize in turning design concepts into manufacturing realities. Our team of expert engineers can review your current designs, suggest DFM improvements, and guide you through the injection molding process from start to finish. Contact EnTech Plastics today to schedule a consultation. Let us help you transform your design challenges into manufacturing successes.

One critical aspect that manufacturers and designers must grasp to ensure successful injection molding projects is tolerance. In this blog, we delve into the world of tolerances in custom injection molding; exploring what they are, why they matter, and how to manage them effectively for high-quality results.

In the world of plastic injection molding, achieving complex and multifunctional product designs often requires innovative techniques. Two such techniques, overmolding and insert molding, have gained prominence for their ability to enhance product functionality and versatility. In this blog, we will explore the concepts of overmolding and insert molding, understand their differences, delve into their applications, and examine the advantages they bring to the world of manufacturing. Understanding Overmolding and Insert Molding Overmolding and insert molding are specialized injection molding processes that involve combining multiple materials or components to create a single product. These techniques are employed to add a layer of material or incorporate separate components into a primary molded piece. While they share some similarities, they have distinct applications and use cases. Overmolding: Overmolding is a process where a second material is molded over a pre-existing part or substrate. The primary part (the substrate) is typically made of a rigid material, while the overmold material is often elastomeric or soft, creating a soft-touch or ergonomic grip. Overmolding is commonly used to enhance product aesthetics, ergonomics, and grip comfort. It also provides durability and protection to the underlying component.

In the world of injection molding, material selection is just as important as design and manufacturing processes. Engineered resins have become a game-changer in modern manufacturing, offering superior strength, durability, and resistance to extreme conditions.

Low-volume injection molding projects are essential for many businesses looking to produce custom plastic parts efficiently and sustainably.

The Ultimate Guide to Gas Assist Injection Molding By leveraging gas to perfect the molding process, manufacturers can now create lightweight, complex parts with superior strength and reduced waste. But how does it actually work? What advantages does it offer your operations? And where does the future of this technology lead? Whether you’re a seasoned industry professional or looking to integrate Gas Assisted Injection molded parts into your production line, this ultimate guide covers everything you need to know. What is Gas Assist Injection Molding? Gas assist injection molding (GAIM) is an enhanced injection molding process often used for complex parts, large parts, and parts requiring an attractive, cosmetic finish. The types of parts benefiting most from this process include: Large panels Enclosures Handles Doors Tube or rod-shaped parts